Financial Data & Analytics · 40,000+ users

Advanced Research
Platform Redesign

Redesigning LSEG Workspace's Advanced Research tool — a complex document discovery and analysis platform used by 40,000+ financial professionals globally — to reduce search friction, improve discoverability, and unlock faster insight for analysts and portfolio managers.

Company
LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group)
Role
Lead UX Designer
Domain
Financial Data & Analytics
Year
2023–2024
LSEG Advanced Research — results table showing equity research documents

Advanced Research — results table with Boolean search, relevance scoring, ESG tags, keyword count, and bulk download actions.

01 — Problem Statement

The tool didn't match how analysts actually research

LSEG Workspace's Advanced Research (ADVRES) module gave access to hundreds of thousands of equity research documents — initiation reports, SOTP analyses, earnings estimates, sector deep-dives — from thousands of global contributors. The data was unmatched. The experience was not.

User & domain analysis revealed that analysts follow a consistent mental workflow when researching: they start with a broad investment question, progressively narrow it into a structured query, scan results to assess relevance, shortlist candidates, and finally examine selected documents in depth. ADVRES was designed around a flat search-and-table paradigm that cut across every step of this workflow — forcing analysts to hold the entire research process in their heads rather than having the tool support it.

The Analyst Research Workflow — from user & domain analysis
01
Formulate
Translate an investment question into a search query
02
Search
Execute query across documents and contributors
03
Assess
Triage results — relevance, recency, contributor quality
04
Pick
Shortlist candidate documents worth examining
05
Examine
Read, extract insight, download for further use

The redesign challenge was to make ADVRES understand and support this workflow end-to-end — removing friction at every transition point, so analysts could move fluidly from question to insight without fighting the tool.

01
Query formulation was unsupported
The search field accepted Boolean operators but gave no guidance — most analysts didn't know the capability existed or how to use it effectively.
02
Filter composition was too complex
10+ filter dimensions (subjects, industries, regions, contributors, report types, pages, time period) were hard to compose and impossible to save or re-run.
03
Result assessment had no visual triage
The results table showed raw counts with no relevance signal — analysts had no way to quickly assess hundreds of results against their research question.
04
Keyword context was invisible
Results showed a keyword count but not where or how the term appeared — analysts had to open each document individually to assess relevance.
05
Candidate shortlisting was manual
There was no way to select, compare or track shortlisted documents within the tool — analysts kept parallel lists in Excel or email.
06
Document examination and export were fragmented
Downloading, merging, or printing multiple reports required separate manual steps. Analysts wasted significant time assembling morning briefings.
Solution Statement

Redesign ADVRES around the analyst's natural research workflow — supporting query formulation with structured guidance, accelerating result assessment with inline relevance signals and keyword context, and streamlining document examination and bulk export — so analysts can move from investment question to insight in a single, coherent workspace.

02 — Research & User Interviews

Understanding how analysts actually search

We recruited 14 participants across buy-side analysts, sell-side researchers, and portfolio managers — ranging from power users who built complex SOTP models to occasional users who just needed a quick initiation report. Research was conducted via remote moderated sessions and contextual enquiry at two client sites in London and Amsterdam.

🎙️
User Interviews
14 sessions — buy-side analysts, sell-side researchers, portfolio managers
👁️
Contextual Enquiry
Observed live research workflows at client sites in London and Amsterdam
📋
Task Analysis
Mapped 6 core research workflows from query construction to document download
📊
Analytics Review
Analysed search query logs, feature usage rates, and drop-off points in the existing tool

What analysts told us

I know the research is in there somewhere. But constructing the right search takes longer than it should — so I end up just emailing the contributor directly.

Buy-side Analyst, UK Asset Manager

I need to see the keyword in context. Right now I just see a count — 22 matches — but I have no idea if they're relevant until I open the document.

Research Analyst, European Investment Bank

I want to download the first pages of 30 reports and read them on the train. That workflow doesn't exist — I'd have to open each one and print manually.

Portfolio Manager, Global Asset Management
Key Research Findings
  • Only 23% of users were aware Boolean search operators were supported in the query field
  • Filter panel was hidden below the fold on 1280px screens — 41% of users never expanded it
  • Keyword count column was the most-clicked element, but the tooltip only showed totals — not excerpts
  • 78% of multi-document download tasks failed or were abandoned in usability testing
  • Column settings had never been used by 60%+ of regular users — it was invisible in the UI

03 — Ideation & Low-Fidelity Prototypes

Sketching the search experience

Findings fed into a structured ideation sprint with the product team. We ran a two-day workshop focusing on three core opportunity areas: search transparency, results triage, and bulk workflow actions.

Design Sprint
2-day workshop mapping the full research workflow — from query intent to document action
Opportunity mapping
25 HMW statements clustered into 3 themes: Search, Triage, and Action
Concept sketching
Rapid lo-fi explorations of inline keyword preview, progressive filter disclosure, and column settings discoverability
Concept validation
4 top concepts dot-voted with participants — inline keyword context and progressive filter disclosure ranked highest

Lo-fi wireframe — inline keyword preview on hover, progressive filter bar, relevance bar column

Three core design principles emerged from ideation: progressive disclosure (surface power features only when users signal intent), contextual confidence (show why a result matched, not just that it did), and batch-first actions (design bulk workflows as first-class, not afterthoughts).

04 — User Testing Outcomes

Two rounds with financial professionals

We ran two rounds of moderated usability testing using a high-fidelity Figma prototype. Participants were given realistic tasks — constructing a SOTP screen for a logistics sector report, downloading a merged morning briefing, and customising their results columns — mirroring actual day-to-day workflows.

Round 1
8 participants
Focus: Core search and filter workflows — could analysts construct a compound query and triage results without guidance?
Outcome: Filter panel discovery was the biggest blocker — 6 of 8 users missed it. Keyword count column was clicked by all but showed no preview context.
Round 2
7 participants
Focus: Revised filter panel (always-visible summary strip), inline keyword preview tooltip, and updated column settings discoverability.
Outcome: Task completion for filter-based searches improved from 38% to 91%. Keyword preview was described as 'the feature I didn't know I needed'.
91%
Filter task completion
Up from 38% in Round 1
60%
Faster query construction
With Boolean search guidance
More columns configured
After settings panel redesign
100%
Bulk download success
Up from 22% in baseline testing
Key Changes From Testing
  • Replaced hidden filter panel with always-visible summary strip showing active filters as chips
  • Added inline keyword preview tooltip on hover — showing page number and surrounding context
  • Surfaced column settings as a persistent icon in the table header (not buried in page settings)
  • Introduced query builder helper with Boolean operator suggestions for first-time users
  • Redesigned Download dropdown with three clear options: Separate Files, Merge, First Pages Only

05 — Final Design

Advanced Research — shipped

Here are the final screens shipped to 40,000+ LSEG Workspace users across global financial institutions.

Advanced Research results table — Boolean search, relevance scoring, ESG tags

Results table — compound Boolean search, SOTP filter, relevance bars, ESG indicator tags, keyword count, contributor and pricing columns.

Expanded Filter Panel

The always-visible filter strip replaced the hidden panel — giving analysts access to all 8 filter dimensions without hunting for them. Subjects/Topics, Industries, Countries/Regions, Analysts, Time Period, Pages, Report Types, and Contributors are all accessible in one row, with active filters shown as persistent chips. The "Last Run" timestamp tells analysts exactly how fresh their results are.

Advanced Research expanded filter panel with all 8 filter dimensions

Filter panel — all 8 dimensions visible: Subjects, Industries, Countries/Regions, Analysts, Time Period, Pages (>10), Report Types, Contributors. Last Run: Mar 09, 18:50:15.

Keyword Context Preview

The most impactful change from user testing: clicking the keyword count now opens an inline preview showing exactly where the keyword appears in the document, the surrounding sentence context, and the page number — so analysts can assess relevance without opening every document. Match counts are broken down by keyword so compound queries are immediately scannable.

Keywords modal — inline context preview showing page number and surrounding text

Keyword context modal — Total matches (4): Earnings (4). Shows page number and surrounding paragraph context with highlighted terms.

Column Customisation

The Settings panel — previously invisible to 60% of users — was redesigned as a persistent sidebar accessible from a clear icon in the table header. Users can now toggle 14 columns (Published Date, Available Date, Indicator, Keyword Relevance, Company, Title, Contributor, Pages, Estimate Rating, Recommendation Rating, Status, Countries/Regions, Industry, Analyst) and reorder them via drag-and-drop.

Column settings panel — 14 configurable columns with toggle and reorder

Orders Table Columns — 14 configurable columns with searchable list, toggle visibility, and drag-to-reorder. Accessible from the table header icon.

Bulk Download Actions

The Download dropdown was redesigned with three distinct, clearly labelled actions addressing the three most common analyst workflows: downloading individual files for archiving, merging reports into a single briefing document, or extracting first pages only for a rapid morning scan. The options are now the primary action on the results table, not buried in a secondary menu.

Download dropdown — three options: Separate Files, Merge Into One Document, First Pages Only

Download actions — Download As Separate Files · Merge Into One Document · Merge First Pages Only. Primary action on the results table.

06 — Outcomes & Impact

Impact across 40,000+ users

40k+
Financial professionals
Using the redesigned platform globally
91%
Filter task completion
Up from 38% pre-redesign
60%
Faster query construction
With Boolean guidance and autocomplete
Column customisation
Usage increase after settings redesign
What We Shipped
Redesigned results table with relevance bar and ESG indicator column
Always-visible filter strip with active filter chips
Inline keyword context preview with page number and surrounding text
Column settings panel — 14 configurable columns with drag-to-reorder
Boolean search query builder with operator guidance
Three-option bulk download: Separate, Merge, First Pages Only
Subscription vs Real-time tab architecture for content type switching
Persistent DOC INFO panel for document metadata without opening the file
🔒

This case study presents a condensed overview. Full research outputs, design specs and interaction documentation are confidential to LSEG. Happy to walk through the complete process — get in touch.

All case studiesNext: Centrica →